FLOW
Follow FLOW:
TwitterFacebook
 Families Genera Species Names Vernacular names Publications Authors Geographical distribution Associated taxa Cavernicolous Fossils Images Type specimens repositories Synopsis Updates Classification Molecular data contactProjectFulgoromorpha
English
English
Chronological account
Cacopsylla (Thamnopsylla) burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 previous combination of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 according to Burckhardt & Ouvrard (2012): 19
Use(s) (chresonymy)
Psylla pyrisuga Foerster, 1848 misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Sasaki (1954): 35 according to Cho et al. (2017): 80
Psylla pyrisuga Foerster, 1848 misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Miyatake (1964): 27 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Cacopsylla pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848) misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Inoue (2010): 352 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Cacopsylla (Thamnopsylla) pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848) misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Kwon (1983): 42 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Psylla pyrisuga Foerster, 1848 misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Kuwayama (1908): 165 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Psylla pyrisuga Foerster, 1848 misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Shinji (1944): 448 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Cacopsylla pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848) misidentification of Cacopsylla burckhardti Luo, Li, Ma & Cai, 2012 in Park (1996): 272 according to Cho et al. (2017): 83
Biological interactions
Host-plant
Pyrus calleryana Decne. (Rosales, Rosaceae) according to Cho et al. (2017): 80  [ confirmed ]
Pyrus communis L. (Rosales, Rosaceae) according to Cho et al. (2017): 80  [ confirmed ]
Pyrus pyrifolia var. culta (Makino) Nakai (Rosales, Rosaceae) according to Cho et al. (2017): 80  [ confirmed ]
Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. (Rosales, Rosaceae) according to Cho et al. (2017): 80, Luo et al. (2012): 65  [ confirmed ]
Geographical distribution  (partial)
China North-Central (Gansu)  according to  Luo et al. (2012): 65, Cho et al. (2017): 80
Japan (Hokkaido)  according to  Cho et al. (2017): 80
Japan (Honshu)  according to  Cho et al. (2017): 80
Japan (Shikoku)  according to  Cho et al. (2017): 80
Russian Far East  according to  Cho et al. (2017): 77
South Korea  according to  Cho et al. (2017): 80
Distribution map: extant taxa
Opacity 30%
Data accuracy
Level 4
Levels 1, 2 and 3
(TDWG standard) GBIF occurrences